Re: Use SIGQUIT instead of SIGUSR1?

Tom Lane writes:

> I think it'd be a good idea to change the code so that SIGQUIT is the
> per-backend quickdie() signal, not SIGUSR1, to bring the postmaster and
> backend signals back into some semblance of agreement.

I think we agreed on this already when someone wanted to use a signal for
synchronizing "near-committers".  Still seems like a good idea.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/