Re: Proposed WAL changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Proposed WAL changes
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103071755120.986-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposed WAL changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ?
>
> In general, yes.  I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option,
> you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint
> subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread
> postgresql.conf anyway.  Peter, is that correct?

Nope.  The configuration file is only read at postmaster start and after
SIGHUP.  If any starting backend would read it automatically, the admin
could never be sure about his edits.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL & SHM principles
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposed WAL changes