Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102161741290.1009-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Doc indexes (was Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use?)
RE: [DOCS] Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane writes: > Aside from persuading more people to spend time answering email > questions, I agree we need to work harder on making answers findable > outside the mailing lists. Improving the docs, making the mail archives > more easily searchable, etc etc. I dunno if an "annotated manual" would > help --- I've never used one --- but if people want to try one, it can't > hurt. The main problem is to get the work done. We need volunteers to > actually do some of these things, not just suggest them ... One thing we should try to do in the future (i.e., the next big attack I have on you) is to maintain a human-edited concept index for the docs, like every good non-fiction book has at the end. The technical details for this are mostly worked out, it just needs someone to compose a list of all "concepts" and find all the places where they're discussed. This might even be something to stick in for the 7.1.1 release, because otherwise there will be another 8 month lag before it becomes useful. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: