Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141808310.1112-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is > > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it? > > I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and > I'll object to any attempt to remove the option. The description should be updated though: http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do if I turn off fsync anyway." -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: