Re: two cents
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: two cents |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102101040440.775-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | two cents ("George Johnson" <gjohnson@jdsc.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
George Johnson writes: > Reading the 20 or so Re's to NFS issues as well as the last few months of > list watching, as well as my own crash experience etc, what is the current > direction/state of things regarding backup, replication etc with postgresql? > Do you foresee pg_dump being used in the long term? It is sounding like > people are screaming for an automated, reliable way/state for shifting data > out of the database. Or a "hot copy" function. Backup will probably stay pg_dump's domain indefinitely. It has a "hot copy"/snapshot/consistent dump capability, it can be automated, and we'd like to think that 7.1's incarnation is a lot more reliable, too. Eventually, maybe even in the 7.2 release, WAL based backups will be available as well. Replication is available at www.erserver.com. A stripped down/introductory version (so I understand) is in contrib/rserv in 7.1. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: