Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102061734550.775-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken? (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > Moreover if postmaster detaches itself to be a deamon, nohup is not > necessary at all. Right. Scrap that thought then. > BTW, for the startup script, I don't think we need to use pg_ctl. > Invoking postmaster directry seems enough for me. The only reason for > using pg_ctl to start postmaster is waiting for postmaster up and > running. Waiting for the postmaster to start up is really only useful when you start it interactively, either during development, or if you need to repair a problem. In either of these cases you might as well (and probably rather should) look at the log output yourself, i.e., just use 'postmaster'. > In most cases the time to recover DB would not be so > long. And if the recovery took too long time, we would not want to be > blocked in the middle of the boot sequence anyway. Exactly. No waiting on startup by default then? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: