Re: design
| От | Brett W. McCoy |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: design |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101301145380.10014-100000@chapelperilous.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | design (Jeff <jeff4e@rochester.rr.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff wrote:
> I have a design question. Lets say we want to keep track of users and
> their respective snail mail addresses. Each user can have up to 4
> different mailing address. Is it better to have all this information in
> one table. Or is it better to have a user table and an address table,
> and have the user id as a foreign key in the address table?
I would put the addresses in a separate table and use the foreign key.
That way each user can have as many addresses as you want. A year from
now you might change your requirement to 5 addresses. Or perhaps you want
to keep historical information.
In general, if you find yourself designing a table where duplicate
information is showing up (in this case, if you had only used one table,
user names would have been entered 4 times, once for each address), you
need to apply normalization and break it into two (or more) tables.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: