Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101221711090.1090-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker writes: > Is anyone looking at doing this? Is this purely a MySQL-ism, or is it > something that everyone else has except us? It's not required by SQL, that's for sure. I think in 7.2 we'll tackle schema support, which will accomplish the same thing. Many people (including myself) are of the opinion that not allowing cross-db access is in fact a feature. > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:03:58 -0600 > From: Dave Glowacki <dglo@sweetpea.ssec.wisc.edu> > To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> > Cc: Radovan Gibala <gigi@agraf.sk>, ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB > > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Radovan Gibala wrote: > > > Is there any possibility to get a port for MySQL with BerkleyDB support? > > > I realy need the transaction support and I'd like to build MySQL from a > > > port. > > > > why not just build PgSQL, and have transaction support *with* subselects > > and everything else that mySQL doesn't have? > > I'd *love* to use PgSQL, but it doesn't support cross-DB joins (or at > least I couldn't figure out how to do it.) MySQL handles this, so > I'm using MySQL and would also like to have transaction support... > > > -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: