Tom Lane writes:
> It occurs to me that the only likely use for initdb -t is now served by
> DROP DATABASE template1;
> CREATE DATABASE template1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0;
> ie, we have a *real* way to reconstruct a virgin template1 rather than
> an initdb kluge.
I agree.
> Accordingly, I suggest that initdb -t should be flushed entirely.
Kill it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/