Re: Bit strings
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bit strings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101192324390.1322-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bit strings (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bit strings
Re: Bit strings |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > Any idea where we are on this? > > Bit and hexstring literals are not handled in a reasonable fashion; Bit string literals are handled correctly, although it occurred to me that perhaps #define IsA_Value(t) \ (IsA(t, Integer) || IsA(t, Float) || IsA(t, String)) should be augmented with BitString. Can someone advise? Hex literals are still not handled correctly. > > SQL92 sez we need a position() function for bitstrings. We have one now. > > Need a regression test for bit types. We have one now. > > scalarltsel() and friends need to cope with bit/varbit types in > > order to make good use of indexes on bitstrings. Not done. > > pg_dump does not handle BIT/VARBIT lengths properly (pjw may have > > fixed this by now). Works fine for me. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: