Re: GNU readline and BSD license
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012300101480.822-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GNU readline and BSD license (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker writes: > Is there a reason *not* to move towards that for v7.2 so that the > functions we are making optional with readline are automatic? Since we > could then ship the code, we could make it a standard vs optional > "feature" ... > > My thought would be to put 'make history feaure standard using libedit' > onto the TODO list and take it from there ... In my mind this is a pointless waste of developer time because there is no problem to solve here. I'm sure we all have better things to do than porting libedit to a dozen systems and then explaining to users why the tarball is bloated and their carefully composed readline configuration doesn't work anymore. If there is something functionally wrong with Readline then let's talk about it, but let's not replace it with something because some PHP dude said that RMS said something. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: