On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> > but pgstat_initstats() caught my eye. This gets called about 6 times per
> > insert (I did 100000 inserts) and the major cost appears to relate to the
> > linear pgStatTabstatMessages. The comparative performance of
> > hash_search() suggests that pgStatTabstatMessages may benefit from use of
> > a hash. However, it seems unreasonable that we're doing work at all in
> > pgstat_initstats() if the user is not interested in query/block/tuple
> > stats.
>
> The coding in the search loop could perhaps be tightened a little, but
> I'd think the last point should be addressed by dropping out via the
> "no_stats" exit if stats aren't being gathered.
>
> I doubt a hash is worth maintaining, because the active tabstat entries
> should only be for tables that are being touched in the current command
> (thus, there are not more than six in your example). I'm not sure why
> it takes so much time to look through six entries though ...
Neither. I might look into it further later, but here's a patch to exit
out of pgstat_initstats() if we're not collecting stats (attached).
Thanks,
Gavin