pgstats_initstats() cost

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gavin Sherry
Тема pgstats_initstats() cost
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0308121052520.25197-100000@linuxworld.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pgstats_initstats() cost  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I did some basic profiling of CVS HEAD after having read Bruce's post the
other day: When did we get so fast. It seemed to me that the number of
inserts per second wasn't actually all that high so I had a look at some
numbers:
 %   cumulative   self              self     totaltime   seconds   seconds    calls   s/call   s/call  name 7.32
3.48    3.48   100004     0.00     0.00  yyparse 4.42      5.58     2.10  1200107     0.00     0.00  SearchCatCache
4.10     7.53     1.95   900020     0.00     0.00  base_yylex 3.85      9.35     1.83   100150     0.00     0.00
XLogInsert3.51     11.02     1.67   600540     0.00     0.00  pgstat_initstats 2.24     12.09     1.07  2208418
0.00    0.00  hash_search 1.86     12.97     0.88  2607669     0.00     0.00  hash_any
 

I am still researching ways of increasing performance of yacc parsers --
there is a very small amount of information on the Web concerning this --
but pgstat_initstats() caught my eye. This gets called about 6 times per
insert (I did 100000 inserts) and the major cost appears to relate to the
linear pgStatTabstatMessages. The comparative performance of
hash_search() suggests that pgStatTabstatMessages may benefit from use of
a hash. However, it seems unreasonable that we're doing work at all in
pgstat_initstats() if the user is not interested in query/block/tuple
stats.

Comments? Have I missed something?

Thanks,

Gavin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dropping a user causes pain (#2)
Следующее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oversight?