On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > btw, if somebody could donate a server dedicated for rapidly growing
> > > > > > mailing list archive (already > 300,000 messages) ? fts.postgresql.org
> > > > > > id currently awfull slow !
> > > > > Or wants to spring for the memory upgrade? The server is better then we
> > > > > had before, but memory is half of what it was ...
> > > >
[snip]
> Damn. I think it's time to think seriously about supporting of
> postgresql.org. It's sort of marketing things, but it's very important.
> If, for example, somebody interest in database with full text search
> support and tries fts.postgresql.org, he'll form a very bad opinion
> about search engine, about database. He'll not interested that
> hardware is very limited and this is temporal problem. He will go
> to mysql website :-(
I agree. It is bad form.
Perhaps Red Hat or SRA would be able to help out?
Gavin