Re: got Postgresql working on FreeBSD-alpha
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: got Postgresql working on FreeBSD-alpha |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0011152118300.779-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: got Postgresql working on FreeBSD-alpha (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: got Postgresql working on FreeBSD-alpha
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Alfred Perlstein writes: > > About the regression tests: Apparently you're picking up the wrong > > "expected" files. I can't make out why offhand, though. Modulo that, the > > inet failure looks to be the only real trouble. > > Yes, can you point to at the general location of that code? I'd > like to see if it's a FreeBSD bug, FreeBSD-alpha bug, Postgresql > bug or Postgresql-alpha bug or any combination thereof. :) A short explanation of the mechanism is at the end of src/test/regress/README. Depending on how you invoke the regression test you'll have to look into pg_regress, regress.sh, or run_check.sh for the implementation. I recommend using 'gmake check' or 'gmake installcheck', which would invoke the former. The others are obsolescent. > Question, how much of an impact is using test and set over using > system semaphores? Would it be worth it to patch 7.0.x for alpha > and using hardware spinlocks rather than kernel mutexes? Generally, test and set should be a lot faster. Specifically, the non-TAS code is probably broken and will be removed sometime. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: