Re: problems with configure

Tom Lane writes:

> Not sure what to do about this.  It will clearly not do to define
> ACCEPT_TYPE_ARG3 as void.  Perhaps we need a special case for
> Solaris 7: if we detect that accept() is declared with "void *",
> assume that socklen_t is the thing to use.  Peter, any thoughts?

Perhaps we could, in case "void *" is discovered, run a similar deal with
bind() or setsockopt(), i.e., some socket function that takes a
non-pointer socklen_t (or whatever), in order to find out the true nature
of what's behind the "void *".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/