Re: WAL status update
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL status update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010312322300.1073-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vadim Mikheev writes: > WAL with rollforward logic is available for testing but yet requires > re-compiling with -DXLOG flag. Note that regress tests are passed but > it doesn't mean anything. What is required is testing how recovery > does work (just run pg_ctl -m i stop after some changes in db and test > db after restart). Also, I've tested it for single running transaction > only. xlog.c:XLOG_DEBUG is on currently and results in high output to > stderr. The first test did not go very well. I did a fresh compile, initdb, started the postmaster, ran 'make installcheck' (sequential regression tests), and sent a kill -QUIT to the postmaster during the numeric test. Then I restarted the postmaster and got a load of lines like REDO @ 0/434072; LSN 0/434100: prev 0/433992; xprev 0/433992; xid 17278: Transaction - commit: 2000-10-31 23:21:29 REDO @ 0/434100; LSN 0/434252: prev 0/434072; xprev 0/0; xid 17279: Heap - insert: node 19008/1259; cid 0; tid 1/43 after which it finished with Startup failed - abort -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: