Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010111833440.767-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > I am tempted to apply this. This is the second person who asked for > binding to a single port. The patch looks quite complete, with doc > changes. It appears to be a thorough job. Postmaster options are evil, please put something in backend/utils/guc.c. (This is not the fault of the patch submitter, since this interface is new for 7.1, but that still doesn't mean we should subvert it.) > > 2. The ability to place the Unix-domain socket in a mode 700 directory. This would be a rather sharp instrument to offer to the world at large, because the socket file is also a lock file, so you can't just get rid of it. If we were to offer that anyway, I'd opine that we reuse the -h option (e.g., leading slash means Unix socket) rather than adding a -k option everywhere. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: