Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0009262329330.515-100000@peter
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner writes:

> Didn't Peter & Jan have a rewrite of the permissions system in the pipeline
> - or has that disappeared? What Jan was proposing was rather more
> substantial than just the setuid stuff, I *think*.

If I had known that we wouldn't beta until October I probably would have
started on it.  But there's a technical incompatibility issue at the core
of my idea that would have forced a postpone until 7.2 for some parts
anyway.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Installation layout is still hazardous for shared prefixes