Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0008172123360.346-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes: > > So, anyone have any ideas what NaN would be useful for? Especially given > > we have NULL available, which most (non DB) numeric applications don't. > > Hmm. With Tom Lane's new fmgr interface, you *can* return NULL if you > spot a NaN result. Maybe that is the best way to go about it; we'll > stipulate that NaN and NULL are equivalent. And we'll further stipulate > that if you are messing with NaN then you deserve what you get ;) I beg to differ, this behaviour would not be correct. Instead, this should happen: NULL < NULL => NULL NULL < 1.0 => NULL NULL < Nan => NULL 1.0 < NULL => NULL 1.0 < NaN => false NaN < NULL => NULL NaN < 1.0 => false Then all the NaN's sort either all first or all last before or after the NULLs. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: