Re: responses to licensing discussion
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: responses to licensing discussion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0007060336210.347-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: responses to licensing discussion (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
The Hermit Hacker writes: > Personally, I'd like the whole thing weeded down to ... get rid of the > 'juristiction of ...' (which nobody outside of the US will agree to, from > what I've been seeing on the list) ... and get rid of "Any person who > contributes ..." paragraph, which several ppl have voiced a concern about, > and we might have something that non-US developers can agree to ... > > can someone also explain to me what ", NEED, OR QUALITY, AND ANY IMPLIED > WARRANTY FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. IN ADDITION, THERE IS > NO IMPLIED WARRANTY AGAINST INTERFERENCE WITH ENJOYMENT OR AGAINST > INFRINGEMENT." is supposed to mean? what the hell is "INTERFERENCE WITH > ENJOYMENT OR AGAINST INFRINGEMENT"? It means if you don't enjoy it, you can't sue. :-) I don't see any point for not using the same BOLD (or the same text, for that matter) that the UCB used, as has been suggested a hundred times before. We'd make the extra point of "Licenses are so stupid, they make us write this twice." -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: