Re: MD5
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MD5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0005092335390.387-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MD5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: MD5
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > We've required ANSI-style prototypes all along. There are some other > ANSI features we're willing to work around the lack of, like token > pasting in macros --- You must mean this stuff: :-) [src/include/nodes/nodes.h] | #define nodeTag(nodeptr) (((Node*)(nodeptr))->type) | | #define makeNode(_type_) ((_type_*) newNode(sizeof(_type_),T_##_type_)) | #define NodeSetTag(nodeptr,t) (((Node*)(nodeptr))->type = (t)) | | #define IsA(nodeptr,_type_) (nodeTag(nodeptr) == T_##_type_) There are some provisions for working around this, but evidently they're not used uniformly (which leads me to believe that there's little need to do so). > so the real question is *what* ANSI features does the code require? I think it's fair to assume an ANSI C89 compiler in the year 2000, based on the fact that we don't actually seem to consciously avoid any constructs I know of, modulo the Autoconf safety net. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: