Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??';
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0005091500450.387-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??';
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > Rather than the separate pw files, maybe pg_shadow needs some kind of > provision for database-specific passwords ... Perhaps the issue is not so much having different passwords for each database. I don't think this is necessarily a priority. (I think it would be rather confusing that there would be one user and many passwords.) The issue is that you can't say "Do password authentication, but only for these users". It forces you to make separate password files. Perhaps we could extend the syntax similar to this | host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 passwd &user1,user2,user3 to mean "do password authentication using the pg_shadow passwords, but only for the named users". (`&' would be some special character to distinguish a list of users from a password file name.) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: