Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0005022334270.362-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes: > > A while ago while thinking about a way to make ipcclean better I thunk > > that perhaps the postmaster should write the keys of the segments it gets > > to a flat-text file. If it somehow crashes and loses track of what it > > allocated before it can use that information to clean up. Not sure how > > often that would take effect but it's very socially friendly. > > Hmm. Could we write this to a separate shared memory segment? But how would ipcclean get to the key of *that* segment? I was thinking file because that'd always be in a known location and could also be accessible to humans to sort things out by hand or debug stuff. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: