Re: Does error within transaction imply restarting it?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Does error within transaction imply restarting it? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0004151642160.523-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Does error within transaction imply restarting it? (Haroldo Stenger <hstenger@adinet.com.uy>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Does error within transaction imply restarting it?
Re: Does error within transaction imply restarting it? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Haroldo Stenger writes:
> I seems that other DBMSs, don't care about erroneous statements within
> a transaction. Now, I have several paths to follow: 1) Hacking the
> backend ;-)
If you're really brave you can try this change in
backend/tcop/postgres.c:
if (sigsetjmp(Warn_restart, 1) != 0)
{
time(&tim);
if (Verbose)
TPRINTF(TRACE_VERBOSE, "AbortCurrentTransaction");
- AbortCurrentTransaction();
InError = false;
if (ExitAfterAbort)
{
ProcReleaseLocks(); /* Just to be sure... */
proc_exit(0);
}
}
Absolutely no guarantee, there's probably more to it. Hmm, I wonder, maybe
not.
> How can I motivate key developers to make their way into an action
> plan?
Becoming one yourself or throwing large amounts of cash at the existing
ones. :) Trying the above and tracing down any arising problems might be a
start though.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: