Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0001161848440.1636-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump not in very good shape (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-01-15, Tom Lane mentioned: > I have repaired the most recently introduced coredump in pg_dump, > but it still crashes on the regression test database. Which brings up the idea why the regression tests don't test pg_dump. It's just as important to people as the backend. psql already gets tested more or less. Would it not be a decent idea to do a pg_dump regress > out diff out expected.out at the end of the tests? That way we could catch these problems earlier. (Especially since I'm not sure how many people use pg_dump at all during development.) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: