Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0001122112130.1646-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-01-12, Tom Lane mentioned: > I think this raises the bar to the point where we must > have a transparent backward-compatible approach to psql variables. > I was not all that thrilled about blowing off colon as an operator, > and blowing off array subscripts *too* is just too far above my > threshold of pain. To clear something out here: I'm with you all the way. I didn't make up that syntax, and I too was forgetful about the array issue. If y'all think that a variable must be defined to be substituted and that that will fix things to a reasonable state, thus it shall be. My concern was more that this would only work around this particular problem, while being short sighted. Just want to make sure we have a consensus. > > If I'm going to hack around in that code, one related question: what > > should the deal be regarding variable interpolation into quoted > > strings? Yes/No/Maybe? > > No bloody way, IMHO --- that increases the odds of unwanted I'll take that as a No. ;) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: