Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response

On 1999-11-29, Tom Lane mentioned:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >>>> No nested CASE's?
> >> 
> >> Looks like not. I would guess that it is fairly straightforward to
> >> fix, but am not sure. Tom Lane hunted down an killed most of the CASE
> >> problems (thanks Tom!), and this is in an area he is working on now.
> >> Maybe you can get him to look at it??
> 
> > Is this an item for the TODO list?
> 
> Fixed in current sources, I believe.

The problem (I sent it in) was actually no sub-selects in target list.
Nested cases work fine I believe.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden