Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.20.9912010126370.382-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-11-29, Tom Lane mentioned: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >>>> No nested CASE's? > >> > >> Looks like not. I would guess that it is fairly straightforward to > >> fix, but am not sure. Tom Lane hunted down an killed most of the CASE > >> problems (thanks Tom!), and this is in an area he is working on now. > >> Maybe you can get him to look at it?? > > > Is this an item for the TODO list? > > Fixed in current sources, I believe. The problem (I sent it in) was actually no sub-selects in target list. Nested cases work fine I believe. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: