Re: Confusing terminology

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Roderick A. Anderson
Тема Re: Confusing terminology
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.10.10201190951590.17332-100000@tincan.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confusing terminology  ("Arguile" <arguile@lucentstudios.com>)
Ответы Re: Confusing terminology
Re: Confusing terminology
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Arguile wrote:

> Roderick A. Anderson writes:

> > > ERROR: Relation 'foo' already exists
> >
> > Can a table named foo and a view named foo exist in the same database?
> >
> No. There's no reasonable way for the server to know which you mean when you
> execute a statement. This applies to tables, views, sequences, etc.

It was a rhetorical question (aka. smart-ass).  My point was a table,
view, sequence, and their friends are all relations.  Or at least to my
understanding the table and view are relations.  And therefore Relation 'foo' already exists makes sense to me.


Best,
Rod
--                      Let Accuracy Triumph Over Victory
                                                      Zetetic Institute
     "David's Sling"                                                        Marc Stiegler
 



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: mlw
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [NOVICE] Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures
Следующее
От: "Arguile"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Confusing terminology