Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Todd Graham Lewis
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.04.9904261439510.9925-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Goran Thyni <goran@kyla.kiruna.se>
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Michael Lausch <mla@gams.co.at>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral <taral@taral.net>
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Taral wrote:

> PostgreSQL uses a Berkeley license. That's one of the (many) reasons we
> don't want to bundle any ORB into the package.
> 
> Do we still have problems depending on GPL code?

ORBit is LGPL'd, so there's no license conflict.  And you'd just be
linking against it, not really "including" it, depending on how formal
you want to be about it.  The last time we talked about this, I think
it was announced that ORBit would be acceptable, but that was a while
ago.  Are there searchable archives of the Postgres list?

--
Todd Graham Lewis                        Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises
tlewis@mindspring.net                                (800) 719-4664, x22804

"A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood."          -- George S. Patton


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Lausch
Дата:
От: golliher@coe.uga.edu
Дата:
Сообщение: Quoting backticks
FAQ