Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karel Zak - Zakkr
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000302161415.3304D-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE  (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Karel Zak - Zakkr wrote:
> 
> >  Yes. Just today I look at Oracle's documentation for ROLEs, PROFILEs
> > ... my idea is prepare acl/account code for this freatures too. What?
> 
> I read about that in SQL3 yesterday and I think we could transparently
> adapt the current group scheme to it.
Sorry, I skip this part in my previous letter. Why you mean adaptation
to current group scheme?
                    Karel

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karel Zak - Zakkr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] rpms