Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
| От | Karel Zak - Zakkr |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000223180302.15013F-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > I think so. The problem is that Node struct couldn't be freed safely
> > due to the lack of reference count in its definition. As far as I see
> > plans could be destroyed only when the memory context in which
> > they are placed are destroyed.
>
> This is overly conservative. It should be safe to destroy a plan tree
> via freeObject() if it was created via copyObject() --- and that is
> certainly how the plan would get into a permanent memory context.
Yes, SPI and my PREPARE use copyObject() for saving to TopMemoryContext.
Well, I believe you Tom that freeObject() is correct and I start
implement PlanCacheMemoryContext's routines for PREPARE (and
SPI's saveplan ?).
Karel Z.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: