Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261311190.11546@westnet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10  (Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Mark Mielke wrote:

> I believe hardware RAID 5 is also horrible, but since the hardware hides
> it from the application, a hardware RAID 5 user might not care.

Typically anything doing hardware RAID 5 also has a reasonable sized write
cache on the controller, which softens the problem a bit.  As soon as you
exceed what it can buffer you're back to suffering again.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Chris Hoover"
Дата:
Сообщение: Anyone running on RHEL Cluster?
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances