On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > I'd like to improve it for me and others
> > in my position without making it typographically hideous for fully sighted
> > people :-).
> There is no reason we cannot produce several versions of the docs. It doesn't
> have to be one size fits all.
Agreed, but it is nice to be able discuss paper docs with other people.
And we don't want to "frighten the horses" if someone hits the wrong link
for the download.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew Hugh