Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3)
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011753300.29898@elvis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3)
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Dear Tom, > > Well, the current status of the infrastructure is that there is no hint;-) > > Ah, now I remember why I was waiting to review that stuff: I was expecting > you to come out with a version that actually did some things :-( Well, if you wait for something from me, it is better to tell me directly. I was waiting for anything to happen to the patch (accept, discuss or reject) before submitting anything else. > What you've got at the moment is a patch that significantly uglifies the > grammar without actually doing anything useful, or even clearly pointing > the way to what else will need to happen before it does do something > useful. So it's difficult to form any reasoned judgment about whether > we want to commit to following this path or not. I can see your point. The reasonnable way out of the deadlock that I can suggest is the following: I can resubmit a new patch that would provide the needed infrastructure AND some hints on some commands as a proof of concept of what can be achieved. Then you can decide whether it is worth having this kind of thing on all commands, or not. If not, I won't have passed 3 week-ends in the parser instead if my garden for nothing. If you are okay then you apply, and I'll submit some new patches later on, one command at a time, and when I have time. Does this sound reasonnable enough? -- Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: