Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.58.0404011446090.29898@elvis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Tom, > > So my question still is: Given the fact that I have some use for these > > oids, would it make sense to submit a patch to add them? > > It will be rejected. That's a simple a direct answer as I like them. So I won't bother to submit a patch;-) BTW, maybe you could reject some of the patches I submitted earlier, rather than to simply ignore them? > We removed pg_attribute OIDs some time ago, and we aren't going to put > them back without a much better reason than this. If you need a > specific counterargument, here is one: pg_attribute is normally much the > largest catalog. If we required its rows to have unique OIDs, the > probability of collisions after OID-counter wraparound would be much > greater than it is in other catalogs. Mmh. Maybe you could have considered sequences. -- Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: