Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded?
| От | Rich Teer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.21.0005291933560.24272-100000@zen.rite-group.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL multi-threaded? (Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > Postgresql works under a multi-process model, it will take advantage > > of multiple processors. However it not multi-threaded. > > > So in other words, it *is* multithreaded. It just uses heavyweight > threads. Thanks - but I did mean (light weight) threads, as opposed to processes. I think the former can be more efficient than the latter - although perhaps a bit more tricky to design well! -- Rich Teer NT tries to do almost everything UNIX does, but fails - miserably. The use of Windoze cripples the mind; its use should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offence. (With apologies to Edsger W. Dijkstra) If it ain't analogue, it ain't music. Voice: +1 (250) 763-6205 WWW: www.rite-group.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: