Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?
| От | Kris Jurka |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0807311543170.14232@leary.csoft.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think being able to return cstring from a user defined function is > quite dangerous already. I doubt we would ever give that capability to > non-superusers. > > I do agree that creating base types should require a superuser though. > It too seems dangerous just on principle, even if today there's no > actual hole (that we already know of). pl/java already allows non-superusers to create functions returning cstring and base types built off of these functions. It seems safe to me if pl/java is doing the construction of cstring from a user provided java.lang.String. http://wiki.tada.se/display/pljava/Creating+a+Scalar+UDT+in+Java Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: