Re: Atomic operations?
| От | Kris Jurka |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Atomic operations? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0803192335220.29669@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Atomic operations? (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Dave Cramer wrote: > > On 18-Mar-08, at 7:18 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote: > >> Actually it's fine the implicit transaction created by the server to >> support autocommit wraps both queries in a single transaction and does not >> commit/rollback until the end of the second query. >> > Yeah, using v3 protocol this is presented as one prepare/execute. Thanks for > catching that. For the record, v2 sends both statements in a single query message grouping them in the same transaction. v3 sends a prepare and execute for each statement (as required by the extended query protocol), but the transaction is demarcated by the Sync message and there's only one of those. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: