Re: TypeInfoCache
От
Kris Jurka
Тема
Re: TypeInfoCache
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.BSO.4.64.0712192320120.16373@leary.csoft.net
Ответ на
Re: TypeInfoCache (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache danap@ttc-cmc.net
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache dmp <danap@ttc-cmc.net>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache dmp <danap@ttc-cmc.net>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: TypeInfoCache Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > Oliver Jowett writes: > >> But a "varchar" (with no limit) and "text" *are* interchangeable, which >> is why we identify text as VARCHAR > > But note that varchar-with-no-limit is itself a Postgres-ism: it's > not allowed by the standard. > So should varchar(10000000) be returned as VARCHAR or LONGVARCHAR? Right now we return 0 for the precision of text or varchar without length. Perhaps we should return something else for that similar to how we changed the result of ResultSetMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize to return Integer.MAX_VALUE instead of -1 for types without lengths. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления