Re: XAResource implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Kris Jurka
Тема
Re: XAResource implementation
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.BSO.4.64.0711131301130.21066@leary.csoft.net
Ответ на
Re: XAResource implementation (Heikki Linnakangas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: XAResource implementation joël Winteregg <joel.winteregg@gmail.com>
Re: XAResource implementation Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>


On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> It looks like there is indeed a bug in the Postgres driver. I believe it was 
> introduced by the recent changes to keep the connection in autocommit mode 
> when no XA-transaction is in progress.
>
> It's this call sequence that borks it up:
>
> xares.start()
> conn = xares.getConnection()
> // do stuff
> conn.close();
> conn = xares.getConnection()
> // do more stuff
> xares.end()
> xares.commit()
>
> The 2nd getConnection call inadvertently commits the transaction, and opens 
> another one.

When I raised this issue, you said it can't/shouldn't happen.  What's 
different now?  It's still a bug in the driver, but is the calling code 
doing something it shouldn't?

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2007-06/msg00095.php

> Patch attached. I also added a test for this in the test suite.
>

transaction_timestamp() is an 8.2 feature, but since XA is an 8.1 feature 
you should use now() instead.  (No need for a new patch, I've updated mine 
here.)

Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XAResource implementation
От: joël Winteregg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XAResource implementation
FAQ