Re: XAResource implementation
От | joël Winteregg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XAResource implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1195318874.5559.50.camel@hatman обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XAResource implementation (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XAResource implementation
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hello Kris, I saw your change on CVS (Rev 1.13 of PGXAConnection.java). Do you know when it would be packaged with a new build number ? Would it be postgresql-8.X-507.jdbcX.jar ? Many thanks in advance ! Joël On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 17:11 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > Oh, I had forgotten about that. The difference is the close() between the > > getConnection()s. > > > > I started having second doubts about that case you posted in June, so I > > tested what Derby does if you call getConnection() twice, without a close in > > between. You get an error ("Cannot close a connection while a global > > transaction is still active."), so at least they consider it incorrect as > > well. > > I'm not super happy that explicit close vs implicit close has different > transactional behavior, but people really shouldn't be writing code like > this, so I've applied your patch to 8.1, 8.2 and HEAD. > > Kris Jurka >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: