On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Neil Conway wrote:
> The "doing_srf" business is rather tortured, and seems an invitation for
> bugs. ISTM there should be a cleaner way to implement this. For example,
> would it be possible to put all the common logic into one or more
> additional functions, and then have SRF vs. non-SRF cases that call into
> those functions after doing the appropriate initialization?
Here is a new version of the patch which eliminates the doing_srf stuff.
It does seem a lot cleaner this way...
--
Fortune's Real-Life Courtroom Quote #18:
Q: Are you married?
A: No, I'm divorced.
Q: And what did your husband do before you divorced him?
A: A lot of things I didn't know about.