On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Jeffrey Cox wrote:
> I been working with metadata on stored procedures and discovered that I
> can't get parameter names via getProcedureColumns. So i checked out the
> source and took a look at the method. Seems that for column names, a $ is
> appended to the arg type count. I guess I don't know if there is a reason
> that the actual parameter names are not used, or its just low on the TODO
> list. I went ahead and updated the method return column names as stored in
> procargnames of pg_catalog.pg_proc. I have attached a patch.
It just hasn't been updated in a while.
> I honestly don't know if this is the correct mechanism to handle this (I
> poped into #postgres and was told to attach a patch to an email to this
> list), so just point me in the right direction if need be (either on how to
> submit the patch, or why making this change is stupid).
>
This is exactly the place to send it. Any chance we can also convince you
to add a test case and fix COLUMN_TYPE for out parameters?
Kris Jurka