On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Mikko Tiihonen wrote:
>
>> This is a resend since I did not get any feedback to this patch when I
>> sent it two months ago. Could someone at least have some recommendations
>> what I should do to get this patch evaluated or even applied to the
>> official source.
>>
>
> I like the change to use VisibleBufferedInputStream. That's a clean way of
> avoiding copies. I don't particularly like the number parsing changes as
> they're a pretty ugly hack, but I can't deny the performance improvements (I
> saw 30-35%). I plan on applying this unless someone objects.
>
Applied.
Kris Jurka