Re: tightening up on use of oid 0

On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> > Can't the existing PGobject interface handle this.  You can create a
> > PGobject with the correct datatype and a null value and that should work.
>
> OK, so getValue() and toString() return null?

Right.

> This would still mean that setNull() would not work for Types.OTHER, though.
>

I don't think this is a very big deal.  The only place this looks
important is for an overloaded function call.  The previous driver didn't
have any typing at all for NULLs, and I can only recall one complaint
about.  The other API additions you suggested didn't really appeal to me
and we have an "out" with PGobject, so I think we're OK here.

Kris Jurka