(Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Pilosov
Тема (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10106152331010.17529-200000@spider.pilosoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PATCH] inet << indexability  (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>)
Ответы Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.

-alex

On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:

> This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> 
> Please take a look at it. 
> 
> Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked. 
> 
> I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> know too.
> 
> -alex
>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lincoln Yeoh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Следующее
От: Alex Pilosov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords