yet another stupid question (index coverage)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Pilosov
Тема yet another stupid question (index coverage)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10105171714160.7355-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: yet another stupid question (index coverage)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Postgresql doesn't support index coverage, does it?

Some stuff that really flied on [cough] other database seems very slow.
Explain shows it is using index scan, however, it looks like database is
fetching blocks from all over the disk, when all information necessary is
already in index.

For those unfamiliar with index coverage, it is used to avoid access to
the main table when all necessary information can be found in index
itself. (Example: select count(*) where condition, assume table has
1M rows, only 10k of them will be selected. Assume that page in main table
covers 50 records and page in index covers 500 records. Total pages
accessed without index coverage: ~10k, with coverage: ~20).

Any chance of this feature getting on the wish list? :)

I thought about coding that feature myself, but it seems to be quite
involved: Apparently TupleTableSlot as it is _must_ have all information
from the row...

-alex


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martín Marqués
Дата:
Сообщение: rotate sql.log
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: yet another stupid question (index coverage)