Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brett W. McCoy
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSI.3.91.980722122042.7328C-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products  (Amos Hayes <ahayes@ingenia.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products  (Amos Hayes <ahayes@ingenia.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Amos Hayes wrote:

> I almost hate to ask, and really, it's not a big deal to me personally,
> but why is it called "PostgreSQL"?

Originally it was just Postgres, and didn't support any SQL.  When it was
redesigned with SQL support, that's when the SQL postfix came about.
Actually, it was known as Postgres95 originally to differentiate it from
the original Postgres, but as it moved towards SQL compliancy, the SQL
postfix becamse the norm.  The full story is in the PostgreSQL
documentation.

Brett W. McCoy
                                         http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
   -- The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Byron Nikolaidis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]