On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> Vince asks:
>
> > Everybody keeps saying bugzilla. What EXACTLY will bugzilla do for us
> > that would make me want to learn it and install it? BTW, the current
> > wheel was invented a year ago 'cuze nothing really fit what we needed.
>
> The reasons I would choose Bugzilla:
>
> 1. It's *not* written by us so (in theory) we don't have to waste time
> developing yet another bug tracking solution.
What we have is already developed and refining it isn't a problem.
> 2. It sends email to people involved with a bug whenever the detail
> associated with that bug is modified. This includes the reporter, who
> often will feedback that it now works, at which time the fixer or the
> reporter can mark the bug as fixed.
What we have already does this, but noone was using it.
> 3. It complains when a NEW bug hasn't been looked at for /n/ days --
> this means that any not-a-bug's will be closed, while any that are
> really bugs will be accepted.
This would piss off the developers.
> 4. Good query facilities, if a little complex to use.
Please elaborate.
> 5. I think Bugzilla's concepts of products, components and versions fit
> the way we work.
> I envisage that 'Postgres', 'Interfaces', 'Languages' might be products
> that we would have.
> Within 'Postgres' we would have the various subsystems that make up the
> core.
> Within 'Interfaces' we would have 'JDBC', 'ODBC' etc.
> Within 'Languages' we would have 'PL/pgSQL' etc.
I can see a little benefit to this, but for the most part the same
people that are working on the core pieces of PostgreSQL are also
working on the interfaces and languages.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================